C S5-J;t\T G/a
Atlas of Climatology and
Variability in the
GFDL R30S14 GCM
Michael A. Alexander and James D. Scott
60N
30N
-16-12-8-4 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
University of Colorado
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate Diagnostics Center
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
December, 1995
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2013
••» *. ::
r
.' .f ■
http://archive.org/details/atlasofclimatoloOOalex
Atlas of Climatology
and Variability in the
GFDL R30S14 GCM
Michael A. Alexander
James D. Scott
University of Colorado
CIRES
December, 1995
Pennsylvania State University
Libraries
FEB 1 5 1996
Documents Collection
U.S. Depository Copy
University of Colorado
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate Diagnostics Center
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Notice
Mention of a commercial product does not constitute an endorsement by the Univer-
sity o\ Colorado or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Use for
publicity or advertising purposes, of information from this publication concerning
propriet} products or the tests of such products, is not authorized.
Cover Illustration: 200mb U wind speed (m/s) for December, January, February mean conditions
from the GFDL R30S14 model run.
Acknowledgments
The GCM used in this study was developed by the Climate Dynamics Group at the
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, headed by Syukuro Manabe. Peter Phil-
lips performed the R30S14 GCM simulation and also provided the model documen-
tation and output. We are grateful to Isaac Held and Gebriel Lau for their careful
review and many suggestions for improving the Atlas. We would also like to thank
Jeff Whitaker and Mark Borges for their comments.
This Atlas was developed as part of the GFDL-University Consortium project, which
is sponsered by the Office of Global Programs at the National Oceanic and Atmo-
spheric Administration.
in
Tabic of COntonts:
1 isi of Figures page v
1 isi of Symbols page xii
1 . Introduction page 1
2. Data Analysis page 1
3. References page 4
4. Zonal Mean Vertical Cross-sections page 6
5. Seasonal Means on Pressure and Sigma Surfaces page 28
6. Seasonal Mean Surface Plots page 72
InterannuaJ Variability: Interannual Standard Deviations and EOF's page 91
8. Middle Latitude Processes page 101
9. Tropical Processes page 1 16
IV
List of Figures:
Figure i: R30 Model Topography (m) page 5
Figure 1: Zonal Wind (m/s) and Potential Temperature (° K)
for DJF and MAM page 6
Figure 2: Zonal Wind (m/s) and Potential Temperature (° K)
for JJA and SON page 7
Figure 3: Meridional Wind (m/s) for DJF and MAM page 8
Figure 4: Meridional Wind (m/s) for JJA and SON page 9
Figure 5: Meridional Mass-Stream Function (xlO kg/s)
for DJF and MAM page 10
Figure 6: Meridional Mass-Stream Function (xlO10 kg/s)
for JJA and SON page 11
Relative Humidity (%) for DJF and MAM page 12
Relative Humidity (%) for JJA and SON page 13
Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for DJF and MAM page 14
Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for JJA and SON page 15
Fractional Cloudiness (%) for DJF and MAM page 16
Fractional Cloudiness (%) for JJA and SON page 17
Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) for DJF and MAM page 18
Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) for JJA and SON page 19
Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C • m/s)
for DJF and MAM page 20
Figure 16: Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C-m/s)
for JJA and SON page 21
Figure 17: 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C • m/s)
for DJF and MAM page 22
Figure 18: 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C • m/s)
for JJA and SON page 23
Figure
7:
Figure
8:
Figure
9:
Figure
10
Figure
11
Figure
12
Figure
13
Figure
14
Figure
15
Figure 19: Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum (m~/s2)
for DJF and MAM page 24
Figure 20: Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum (m2/s2)
for JJA and SON page 25
Figure 1 1 : 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum
(m2/s2) for DJF and MAM page 26
Figure 22: 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum
~> i ~>
(m-Vs-) for JJA and SON page 27
Figure 23: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
(°C) Northern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 28
Figure 24: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
(°C) Northern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 29
Figure 25: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
( °C) Southern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 30
Figure 26: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
(°C) Southern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 31
Figure 27: 500mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(ni) Northern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 32
Figure 28: 500mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Northern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 33
Figure 29: 500mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Southern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 34
Figure 30: 500mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Southern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 35
Figure 3 1 : 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Northern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 36
Figure 32: 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Northern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 37
Figure 33: 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
On) Southern Hemisphere for DJF and MAM page 38
200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean
(m) Southern Hemisphere for JJA and SON page 39
200mb Zonal Wind (m/s) for DJF and MAM page 40
VI
Figure 36: 200mb Zonal Wind (m/s) for JJA and SON page 41
Figure 37: 200mb Meridional Wind (m/s) for DJF and MAM page 42
Figure 38: 200mb Meridional Wind (m/s) for JJA and SON page 43
Figure 39: 200mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for DJF page 44
Figure 40: 200mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for MAM page 45
Figure 41: 200mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for JJA page 46
Figure 42: 200mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for SON page 47
Figure 43: 850mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for DJF page 48
Figure 44: 850mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for MAM page 49
Figure 45: 850mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for JJA page 50
Figure 46: 850mb Wind Speed and Vectors (m/s) for SON page 5 1
Figure 47: 850mb Velocity Potential (xlO6 m2/s) for DJF and MAM page 52
Figure 48: 850mb Velocity Potential (xlO6 m2/s) for JJA and SON page 53
Figure 49: 200mb Velocity Potential (xlO6 m2/s) for DJF and MAM page 54
Figure 50: 200mb Velocity Potential (xlO6 m2/s) for JJA and SON page 55
Figure 5 1 : 850mb Stream Function (x 1 06 m2/s) for DJF and MAM page 56
Figure 52: 850mb Stream Function (xlO6 m2/s) for JJA and SON page 57
Figure 53: 200mb Stream Function (xl06m2/s) for DJF and MAM page 58
Figure 54: 200mb Stream Function (xlO6 m2/s) for JJA and SON page 59
Figure 55: 850mb Specific Humidity (g/kg) for DJF and MAM page 60
Figure 56: 850mb Specific Humidity (g/kg) for JJA and SON page 61
Figure 57: 500mb Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for DJF and MAM page 62
Figure 58: 500mb Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for JJA and SON page 63
VII
Figure 59: 1 .o\\ I c\ el Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.997, 0.979, 0.935 (%)
for DJF and MAM page 64
Figure 60: I .ow Level Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.997, 0.979, 0.935 (%)
for JJA and SON page 65
Figure 61: Mid Level Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.568, 0.46 (%)
for DJF and MAM page 66
Figure 62: Mid Level Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.568, 0.46 (%)
for JJA and SON page 67
Figure 63: High Level Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.355, 0.257 (%)
for DJF and MAM page 68
Figure 64: High Level Clouds: Composite of sigma levels 0.355, 0.257(%)
for JJA and SON page 69
Figure 65: Mass Weighted Vertical Integral of Net Diabatic Heating
(°C/day) for DJF and MAM page 70
Figure 66: Mass Weighted Vertical Integral of Net Diabatic Heating
(°C/da\) for JJA and SON page 71
Figure 67: Precipitation (mm/day) for DJF and MAM page 72
Figure 68: Precipitation (mm/day) for JJA and SON page 73
Figure 69: Mean Sea Level Pressure (mb) for DJF and MAM page 74
Figure 70: Mean Sea Level Pressure (mb) for JJA and SON page 75
Figure 7 1 : Wind Speed (m/s) for DJF and MAM page 76
1 igure 72: Wind Speed (m/s) for JJA and SON page 77
Figure 73: Wind Stress (N/m2) for DJF and MAM page 78
Figure 74: Wind Stress (N/m2) for JJA and SON page 79
Figure 75: Sensible Heat flux (W/m2) for DJF and MAM page 80
Figure 76: Sensible Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA and SON page 81
Latent Heat Flux (W/m2) for DJF and MAM page 82
Figure 78: Latent Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA and SON page 83
VIII
Figure 79: Short Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for DJF and MAM page 84
Figure 80: Short Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for JJA and SON page 85
Figure 81: Long Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for DJF and MAM page 86
Figure 82: Long Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for JJA and SON page 87
Figure 83: Net Surface Heat Flux (W/m2) for DJF and MAM page 88
Figure 84 Net Surface Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA and SON page 89
Figure 85 Net Surface Heat Flux (W/m2) for Annual Average page 90
Figure 86: Standard Deviation of 500mb Height (m) for DJF and MAM page 91
Figure 87: Standard Deviation of 500mb Height (m) for JJA and SON page 92
Figure 88: Standard Deviation of 200mb Zonal Wind (m/s)
for DJF and MAM page 93
Figure 89: Standard Deviation of 200mb Zonal Wind (m/s)
for JJA and SON page 94
Figure 90 Standard Deviation of Sea Level Pressure (mb)
for DJF and MAM page 95
Figure 91 Standard Deviation of Sea Level Pressure (mb)
for JJA and SON page 96
Figure 92 500mb Height EOF 1 and 2 for DJF page 97
Figure 93 500mb Height EOF 1 and 2 for MAM page 98
Figure 94 500mb Height EOF 1 and 2 for JJA page 99
Figure 95 500mb Height EOF 1 and 2 for SON page 100
Figure 96 3-10 Day filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Heat Flux
(°C • m/s) for DJF and MAM page 101
Figure 97 3-10 Day filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Heat Flux
(°C- m/s) for JJA and SON page 102
Figure 98 3-10 Day filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Moisture Flux
(g ■ m/kg ■ s) for DJF and MAM page 103
i\
Figure 99 3-10 Day filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Moisture Flux
{g m kg s) for JJA and SON page 104
Figure 100 3- 1 0 Day filtered 200mb Flux of Zonal Momentum (m2/s2) for
DJFandMAM page 105
Figure 101 3-10 Day filtered 200mb Flux of Zonal Momentum (m2/s2) for
JJA and SON page 106
Figure 102 3-10 Day filtered 200mb Kinetic Energy (m2/s2) for
DJFandMAM page 107
Figure 103 3-10 Day filtered 200mb Kinetic Energy (m2/s2) for
JJA and SON page 108
Figure 104 3-10 Day filtered Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C • m/s) ,
averaged 35N-55N, for DJF and MAM page 109
Figure 105 3-10 Day filtered Transient Meridional Heat Flux (°C ■ m/s) ,
averaged 35N-55N, for JJA and SON page 110
Figure 106 3-10 Day filtered Flux of Zonal Momentum (m2/s2), averaged
35N-55N, for DJF and MAM page 1 1 1
Figure 107 3-10 Day filtered Flux of Zonal Momentum (m2/s2), averaged
35N-55N, for JJA and SON page 112
Figure 108 Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) , averaged 35N-55N,
for DJF and MAM page 1 13
Figure 109 Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) , averaged 35N-55N,
for DJF and MAM page 1 14
Figure 1 10 3-10 Day Filtered Standard Deviation of 250mb Geopotential
Height (m) (top) and Monthly Mean 250mb Zonal Wind (m/s)
page 1 15
Figure 1 1 1 Mean Zonal Circulation Streamlines and Vectors, averaged
20N-20S, for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom) page 1 16
Figure 1 12 Mean Zonal Circulation Streamlines and Vectors, averaged
20N-20S, for JJA (top) and SON (bottom) page 1 17
I igure 113 Net Diabatic Heating CC/day) , averaged 10N-10S,
for DJF and MAM page 1 18
Figure 1 14 Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) , averaged 10N-10S,
for JJA and SON page 119
X
Figure 1 15 250mb Velocity Potential Anomalies (m2/s) filtered to retain
periodicities of 20-100 days, averaged 10N-10S, for model
year 4 page 120
Figure 1 16 250mb Velocity Potential Anomalies (m2/s) filtered to retain
periodicities of 20-100 days, averaged 10N-10S, for model
year 7 page 121
\i
I ist of Symbols and Definitions
CI P Fractional Cloudiness
q Specific Humidit)
Specific Humidit) at 850 nib
v'q' Transient Meridional Moisture Flux
Q]h Latent Heat Flux at the Surface
1 ong Wave Radiative Flux at the Surface
Q Net Radiative Flux at the Surface
Sensible Heat Flux at the Surface
O Short Wave Radiative Flux at the Surface
Qnc( Net Diabatic Heating
Q j -- Net Diabatic Heating at Sigma Level 0.57
I Q .3(7 Mass Weighted Vertical Integral of Net Diabatic Heating
Prec Precipitation at the Surface
P_i Mean Sea Level Pressure
\J Stream Function
'/ Velocity Potential
/ . 100 20-100 Day Filtered Anomalies of Velocity Potential
0 Potential Temperature
T Temperature
T700 Temperature at 700 mb
1 Surface Wind Stress
V 7" Transient Meridional Heat Flux
rT', _ .q 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Heat Flux
u Zonal Velocity
Zonal Velocity at 200 mb
Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum
u'v\ _ ,f) 3-10 Day Filtered Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal Momentum
v Meridional Velocity
Meridional Velocity at 2(X) mb
Total Velocity at the Surface
0) Vertical Velocity
z-ir/j Geopotential Height at 200 mb
<~> 3-10 Day filtered Standard Deviation
G Interannual Standard Deviation
X* Zonal Anomaly
'lime Average
Departure from the time average
\x\ Zonal Average
Meridional Average
xu
1. Introduction
1. Introduction
An atlas of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Rhomboi-
dal 30 with 14 Sigma Levels (R30S14) general circulation model (GCM) is made
available in order to facilitate the intercomparison of the climate and variability of
the model with observations and other modeling studies. Our goal is to reveal some
of the model's strengths and weaknesses, providing a benchmark for future experi-
ments with the GFDL model.
The R30S14 version of the GFDL GCM is a global, spectral, primitive
equation model. There are 14 unequally spaced sigma levels in the vertical (from
0.9967 to 0.015) and a rhomboidal truncation at wave number 30, yielding a hori-
zontal grid spacing of approximately 3.75° of longitude and 2.225° of latitude. The
model has seasonally varying insolation, sea surface temperature (SST) and sea ice,
but the values are fixed for each day. The SSTs and sea ice vary according to long-
term observed climatologies and the same cycle is repeated for each year in this 17
year integration. The spectral representation of the orography has been improved
by smoothing out some of the artificial ripples in the field that are generated by the
spectral transformation. This model also features gravity wave drag and predicted
clouds. Stratiform clouds form and large scale precipitation begins when the rela-
tive humidity exceeds 100%. Subgrid scale precipitation is parameterized by moist
convective adjustment. The surface temperature over land is calculated assuming
there is no heat storage in the ground. Soil moisture is predicted using the bucket
method, in which the ground can absorb up to 15 cm of rainfall before runoff begins
(Manabe, 1969). Standard bulk aerodynamic formula are used to calculate the sur-
face wind stress and sensible and latent heat fluxes using a constant transfer coeffi-
cient of 1x10 over the oceans and 3x10 over land. More details on the GFDL
GCM can be found in Gordon and Stern (1982), Manabe and Hahn (1981) and Lau
(1981).
2. Data Analysis
The seasonal mean statisties for Deeember-January-February (DJF),
March- April-May iMAM). June-July-August (JJA), and September-October-No-
\ ember (SON), are calculated from 16 years of daily output from the GFDL
R30S 14 model run. Data from the model's sigma surfaces are interpolated to pres-
sure levels: the temperature and wind fields are interpolated linearly, while specific
humidity is interpolated logarithmically to pressure surfaces. In the model's cloud
cover scheme, there is no fractional cloudiness; a grid point at a given sigma level
is either clear or completely overcast. The fractional cloudiness shown in the atlas
is a measure of the number of days in the season where cloud cover is present. For
the layer average fractional cloudiness, the entire layer, made up of 2-3 levels, is
considered overcast if one of the levels is overcast. Diabatic heating is calculated
from the latent heat release associated with condensation, absorbed radiation, ver-
tical diffusion and the convective adjustment process; both the clouds and diabatic
heating are shown on sigma surfaces. The mass weighted diabatic heating is ob-
tained by summing the diabatic heating rate over the 14 model layers.
Variability in the model is diagnosed using interannual standard deviations
- 2
li = 1
calculated from the equation: a(x) = |£ (x(-X) /(n- 1) , where x, is the average
for one season of a particular year (i), x is the long-term ( 1 6 year) seasonal average,
and n is the number of years. Empiracal Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis
(Kutzbach, 1979) is used to objectively identify the dominant modes of 500mb
height variability over the Northern Hemisphere. The fist two EOFs, calculated us-
ing covariances rather than correlations, arc presented.
The zonal average vertical cross-sections are constructed from data interpo-
lated to 8 pressure levels (1000, 850, 700, 500, 300, 250, 200, and 100 mb), except
for the vertical cross-sections of cloud cover, mass-stream function and diabatic
heating, which are constructed from the original 14 sigma levels in the model. The
merdional mass-stream function, \\f , is caculated following Peixoto and Oort
l
(1992), \i/ = 1*271/? cos 0 [v • P] — , where R is the radius of the earth, 0 the lati-
J 8
o
tude, g is gravity, P is the surface pressure, and the brackets denote a zonal average.
A solution for \j/ is then found by vertically integrating this equation starting at the
top of the atmosphere, where \j/ = 0 . The transient meridional momentum, heat
and moisture fluxes are derived from the model output using the following equa-
tions: «V= («-«)• (v-v) , v'T = (v-v) • (T-f) , and v'q' = (v-v) ■ (q-q) ,
where x is the daily value and x is the long-term average for the appropriate season.
These quantities are calculated daily and then the seasonal and zonal means are con-
structed from the daily values.
Time filtering of certain variables is performed using a Lanczos filter (Jus-
tice, 1976; Duchon, 1979), with half power weights at 3-10 days to isolate synoptic
times, and 20-100 days to examine the Madden and Julian Oscillation (Madden and
Julian, 1971). The 3-10 day filter is also used to examine the seasonal cycle of the
North Pacific and North Atlantic storm tracks following Nakamura (1992). We
used 121 weights, which translated to a data loss of 60 days at the beginning and
end of the 17 year time series. The filtering is performed on daily anomalies (rela-
tive to the long-term monthly mean) and the total standard deviation or mean of
these filtered anomalies are then calculated (except in the case of Figs 113 and 1 14,
where the time series of the time filtered anomalies are shown) . Only model years
2-16 are used in the standard deviation calculations, since model years 1 and 17 are
truncated by the filtering process. For filtered covariance statistics, each individual
variable (i.e. v') is filtered before computing the covariances. A few variables,
such as the precipitation and vertical velocity, are spatially smoothed using a nine
point filter in order to emphasize large scale features. The filter weights the central
point, the four adjacent points, and the four corner points by a ratio of 1:0.5:0.3.
3. References:
Duchon. C. E.. 1979: Lanczos filtering in one and two dimensions. J. Appl. Mete-
or.. 18. 1016-1022.
Gordon. C. T.. and W. F. Stern. 1982: A description of the GFDL global spectral
model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 625-644.
Justice, J. H., 1976: Lanczos-type smoothing in N-dimensions. Division of Math.
Sci. paper. University of Tulsa, 24 pp.
Kutzbach. J. E., 1970: Large-scale features of monthly mean Northern Hemisphere
sea-level pressure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 98, 708-716.
Lau. N.-C. 1981: A diagnostic study of recurrent meteorological anomalies ap-
pearing in a 15-year simulation with a GFDL general circulation model.
Mon. Wea. Rev. , 109, 2287-23 11.
Madden, R. and P. R. Julian, 1971: Detection of a 40-50 day oscillation in the zonal
wind in the the tropical Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702-708.
Manabe, S., 1969: Climate and ocean circulation, Part I, The atmospheric circula-
tion and hydrology of the earth's surface. Mon. Wea. Rev., 97, 139-714.
. and D. G. Hahn, 1981: Simulation of atmospheric variability. Mon. Wea.
Rev., 109, 2260-2286.
Nakamura, H., 1992: Midwinter suppression of baroclinic wave activity in the Pa-
cific. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 1629-1642.
Peixoto. J. P. and A. H. Oorrt, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of
Physics, New York, New York, pp. 520.
s-
bfl
C
e2
>,
-
—
c
c_
r
-
—
o
s
t/3
C
m
—
3
if!
uo
on
o
o
ro
to
(§9p) JIT]
4. Zonal Mean Vertical Cross-Sections
I — j I
KX
III ' II
' . ' ooo
OOO
c
CJ
10
ii
m i4
ti
ro o
>
c
■ °
u
~
l"0
HI'''0
C_
c
£
>
^
aj
h-
>,
-
o
■ ^
A
•: CN
e
-3
<D
<U
o
<U
CLh
~I
T3
u
1 I
c
T3
1 1
f ;l o
n,
C
CM
, — x
• ~
~3
C/3
o
CD
T3
c
-
_jz;
X!
c/3
—
lO
C/3
.o
|
t/3
Q
00
0
- — >
' .1
o
?
r—
0
1 —
, i
y
~^
o
~
X:
C
N
<
LT)
s
^
T5
00
<
~
' '
13
, — N
ID
c~
o
0
o
N
U-
Q
b/j
o o o o o ooo
o o o o o ooo
ro tJ- lD CD r~^ 00CDO
(qui) ssajj
(qui) sso.irj
<
ICD
E
IS
o
o
o
o
■—
CM
o o o oooco
o o o o o ooo
ro -t in (Dr~- oocno
o
O
O
o
o o o o o ooo
o o o o o ooo
ro ij- lD <£> I--- 00OTO
(qui) sssjj
(qui) ssajj
—
<
- i
c
p.
<
c
rd
CX
O
m
^>
Q
o
T3
r3
O
t3
•_
<
C
O
N
m
bfl
<■ J
' >
' 1
' >
o ooooo
C )
< ,
• >
' >
o ooooo
■
< 1
\> ,
-t
un cd i^oocro
(qui) SS9JJ
(qui) ssojj
<
z
o
1
o
o
T — ' I I
O O O O OOOOO
o o o o o ooco
CM rO Tf LO cor-^oocno
o
o
z
o
c
c
o
c
■A
c
^ T3
o
M
l-l
u
>
<
c
—
-
o
o
o
o
o oooco
o
o
o
CD
o ooooo
<—
cn
m
-*-
m co r--oocno
(qui) ssajj
(qui) sssjj
_i
X
<
bl)
i i I
-^
m ,
CSJ ',
o
1
^—
\
X
~--_
-! 1 1 1 r-
-: :, CO I 00 Ol ^c
o o o
in p.,
•r- O
pu .a
If)
I
CO
in
-
CO
>
(L)
O
LD
'J
c
CN
c
rt
,
l-l
CO
<L>
oo
c
^
O
o
'o
X
/i
o
*—<
c~
r3
m
(3
C
-3!
i^
c
-;
a o
<0
O
CO
•— cNjro-^-Lncor^oocr>
ooooooooo
p\rrj t?lu7)[<s;
[OAOq BUlSlS
[0
<
M
X
If)
CM
o
1 .
E
c
X
z
s
—
c
-
-
^-^
s.
—
c
-3
s*
<u
<
CJ
■—J
>
•„
—
C
c
cj
■j-j
u
too
c
_<i
<u
--*.
o
'
<D
m o
>
X
/;
i — i
C
■ — *
c_
c
~z
m .2
~~z
CN
5 o
00
j—
O
o
c
/:
r- •
-^
u
£
^
_^
y.
i
r.
s
/
■ i
/
$
- ^
-
C
—
■C
—
^csiiv~)^i-u~>cor--oocr>
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
|3A3q BUlSTg
J9A91 T3LUBTS
II
:
<
>
■H
&
<0
73
>-.
(U
<
c
o
N
3 C
o o
o o ooooo
o o o oooo
rr in icr- oocno
< >
r >
' >
' -
o ooooo
' >
' >
• I
' i
o o oooo
■
' 1
ro
-!
lo U3 r-oocno
(qui) ssoj^
(qui) ssajj
12
<
^
z
o
E
c
o
£
O
—
o
<
a
T3
■ —
E
3
E
u
>
Ej
u
<
c
o
N
3
- —
—
o
o
o
o
o o oooo
o
o
o
CD
o o oooo
^
CN
m
>*
m to r^-oocro
o
o
o
o
o o OOOO
o
o
o
O
O O OOOO
'""
CM
f~>
■tf
m <n r^-oooTO
(qui) ssajj
(qui) SS3JJ
13
z
<
S
B
Q
—
-O
a
'o
o
i:
o
■ —I
bO
ed
G
O
N
On
B
WO
o o o oooov
O O O OOOO
' J
r j
r J
o oooo
C )
' '
o
r >
'' >
o oooo
•
' J
rO
•t
r i
to r-oocoo
fqiuj SS3J<j
(qiu) SS3JJ
14
<
B
is
c
in
IS
1
o
o
O
o
o
o
<—
rxj
rO
o o o oooo"-
o o o oooo
"tf- LD LO r-~ oocno
o o oooov
O O OOCXD
in to i^- oocno
(qui) sssjj
(qui) SS3JJ
15
—
—
o
m
o
"3-
O
O
CM
<
-
' - o o
ooooooooo
[3A9'] tfltll?^
[OAOq buiSis
16
<
^
z
c
&
o
c
O
C
o o
<
o
' — 1
ro
—
^
- — '
X
y.
<U
t i
• i-H
CNJ
"J
C
U
<D
M)
o
-
,-~
o
^
<
.
r^
d
c
N
r\
—
')
•—
3
CJj
—
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
|3A3q BUIBI£
|3A3"] 611131$
17
o<
<
u
O)
c
X)
-a
c
c
1—9
Q
£
**3
(D
■9
1)
00
cd
■~
C
O
N
3
•— CNlrOtJ-l^tDr^OOCD'—
ooooooooo
[9A9^ BUlSlS
(OAO^ RUlSfS
<
OJ
I to
;
Hm
■ cm
LD
Z 1
o 1
^ 1
11 LO
In
11 r-
ro
ro
[CM
<N
LO
O
O
■"CMrO^iniDNCOOl
ooooooooo
|3A3q BUI§TS
{3A9^ EUIoTS
[9
\
<
\
u
Ix.
o ooooo
o ooooo
10 co r^ oooto
o
' 1
o
< 1
' 1
o oooo
'■ I
o
' •
o
' >
ooooo
■-
CNI
<■ •
•1
If 1
to i^-oocto
(qui; sssj^
(qui) ssajj
20
<
\
u
o
t-
o
o
CM'".'
rft
o
|lO
s
" r^
U
o
Im
00
o
tx
r-O
o
o
o
o
o
o oooo
o
o
o
o
CD
o ooco
«—
CM
to
^
in
to r~-oocno
o
o
o
o
o
o oooo
o
o
o
o
o
o oooo
CM
m
Tl-
m
to r-~oooTO
qui) sssjj
(qui) ssaij
2!
s
-
u:
<
LO
o
\
U
o
hn
— ' 1 ' 1 — r
o o o o oooco
o o o o oooo
(nj to -r lO '-o r- oocto
c
o
-a
o
--.
o
^->
-C
c
s
I to
G
1-4
<
S
3
cu
, ,
1 1
1 . 1
1 lr'
£
o
rJ
LU
Q
Q
:■.-.':
o
•—.
IK i<o
i
o
1)
O)
bij
N
—
(/)
—
Ifc
c >
>
1")
m
<
u
, —
0
r3
N— s
G
C
X
N
UL,
o
r-
■ — i
< — i
Ri
0)
(U
l-l
X
3
(/)
00
u-
-i — i — r
o o o ooooo
o oooo ooo
ro ■**■ LD to r-- oooo
(qui; ssojfj
(qui) SS3Jtf
22
<
o
I
o
or
o
K
O
"3
CJ
•_
u_
c
-C
z
O
c
H.
o
o g
as s:
< o
N E
do §
DC
5
11-
o
o
o
O
O
O OOCDO
o
o
CD
O
CD
O OOCDO
*—
CM
ro
^r
IT)
CD r--00ODO
o
o
O O O O ooooo
o o o o ooooo
cm ro -^- m to r-- oocddo
(qui)ssaij
(qui) SS3JJ
23
f:
o
O
O
3
C
a;
S
G
r-3
C
0
N
o o
LL
o
03 «
CM
s <
•2 S
■a "2
aj G
o
s 5
c o
(U +-*
c3 'Z?
H^
o
<u o
bO "+-1
03
•—
o
>
<
1 — ,
-3
C
0
N
ON
' — 1
0)
l-c
2
bJO
LU
o o o o ooooo
o o o o ooooo
' •
r 1
r 1
r >
' •
ooooo
' ■
' >
' >
< >
ooooo
1
ro
-t
m
cd r^-ooao
qui) ssojfj
(qui) ssgjj
24
<
o
o o o o o
in «3- ro cnj «—
I l l I I
O
cm
C
2
c
GO
0y)
: Oi Mi
o o o o
■nf- rO CM «-
III
O
to
o
o
CN
■f.
\
6
—
C
o
6
o
c3
G
C
N
c3
C
O
o %
o
y.
o
on
4-1 &
c o
IS
2 1=3
S3
—
C
c
N
d
a
3
-
o
o
c
O
o oooco
o
o
o
O
o ooooo
'"
CN
*n
«tf
in ud i--.oocto
o
o
o
O
o
OOCX3D
o
o
o
o
CD
OOOOO
"""
CM
ro
^t
u)
10 noooo
(qui) SS3JJ
(qui) SS3JJ
25
k
'iD O > 'O ',
CNI'CM', ', •— i
/
\
<
10
oo CM
-o
O
- .
o o oooco
o o o ooooo
"~, t lo co r- oooo
-i — r
o oooo ooo
o oooo ooo
ro -t in (£ih- oocno
X
-
Uh
~
F=
c
n
O
— )
o
S-H
j-j
<U
s :
<
c
2
y
Tj
a
r
eg
r3
H
Oh
^3
O
(1)
•—
' — ■
<U
Uh
' 1
— 1
uu
Q
o
CO
eg
CD
<
C
O
N
(N
cd
c
0
N
(qui) SS3JJ
(C)LU) SS9JJ
26
o
<
I
■ ^ • i :
J rDjcvi! ; ; I ' I i ^
Z
c
o
\ \ » \ i_. \ o',
, m;oLO >"~]
icM'csj*-- ! I i
' i •': i i ;
00
--o
1 E
o o
S3 e
% z
- o
5 oo
c c
cd c3
!-.
H
■—
fc
Cl,
O
lO
>.
c
hi
l+H
Q
<N
o
V,
i
£
LO
m
CN
£
-
r
■t— i
0)
c
>
1)
<
E
i
0
o
s
0
__
N
?3
C
0
ri
ri
N
U
0
—
3
M
Hh
o
o
o
O
o
o oooo
o
o
o
CD
O
O OOOO
"-
CM
rO
^r
i/i
CD r--oocno
o
o
o
O
O
o oooo
o
o
o
o
O
o oooo
"—
CN
rO
>*
lO
CD r~~-OOOTO
(qui) SS3JJ
(qui) ssgjj
27
5. Seasonal Means on Pressure and Sigma Surfaces
-
3>
-
3
T*70o(°C)
DJF
80 E
T%)o(°C)
MAM
80 H
8
2
0
8
4
2
0
I i jure 23: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
( '• C), Northern Hemisphere for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
28
T*7oo(°C)
JJA
c
3s
LU
O
180 E
T*7oo(°C)
180 E
SON
I
8
6
4
2
0
8
6
4
2
0
Figure 24: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
(° C), Northern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
29
T*7on(°C)
DJF
y
-
HOE
T*7,)(,(°C)
MAM
180E
6
4.5
113
1.5
0
6
4.5
13
1.5
0
ire 25: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
' Southern Hemisphere for D.JI; (top) and MAM (bottom)
U)
T*7oo(°C)
JJA
o
o
180 E
T*7oo(°C)
SON
180 E
I
4.5
3
1.5
0
6
4.5
1.5
0
Figure 26: 700mb Departure of Temperature from the Zonal Mean
( ° C), Southern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
31
z*500(m)
P.ll-
-
-
180 E
z*50o(m)
MAM
O^C -■ ' ^ - ^r — s „ ^~^r
,-'--
' / ^!rJ^^>^c^~T^^^^~^-^l
\\ -
Y?
^'—'''k%0^Jvir^ ** '
i '-'''
'///f J\M ' zXy{^
w
/
HjJjJpffi- 1 oovvyy
^a&7
fir
7 f
80 H
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
"OOmb Departure ol'Cieopotential Height Iron) the Zonal Mean (m),
Northern Hemisphere lor I J>.H flop) and MAM (bottom)
32
z*5oo(m)
JJA
3*
180 E
500
(m)
SON
80 E
I
175
50
25
0
Figure 28: 500mt> Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean irrij.
Northern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
33
z*50o(m) DJF
_
180E
z*SOo(ni) MAM
80 E
80
60
40
20
0
80
60
40
20
0
500mb Departure of Geopotentia] Height from the Zonal Mean (m),
Southern Hemisphere for D.JF (top) and MAM (bottom)
34
z*50o(m)
JJA
ON
180 E
2*500 (m)
SON
100
80
160
20
0
100
i 80
60
40
20
0
180 E
Figure 30:
500mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean (m)
Southern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
35
z*200(m)
D.ll-
_
3"
-
80 E
200
(m)
MAM
^___^^y :._,
-^-^^-f^''~'yL^''
^^9S^%\''
,i
1 //~ ' y^SyPraV^'^'
\'R
iV ■■/Z^^K&A l
I c
. //,< ,'"-y > \ w£? »* N
Us
\_Jpli. -JPrf^^
~ K^^]oo-;;':-^y / ,,--
-v
v ^^T^-C1' """"^ / '''
\^ •• ^JPy/
_^y /,...
80 E
■ 200
;
150
100
50
0
200
150
1 100
i50
0
200mb Departure ol Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean (m),
Northern Hemisphere for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
J6
z*200 (m)
JJA
180 E
z*200 (m)
SON
180 E
150
100
50
0
150
100
50
0
Figure 32: 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean (m),
Northern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
37
z*2oo(m)
DJF
_
-
c
o
180E
z*9nn(m)
MAM
80
75
50
25
0
Figure 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean (m),
Southern Hemisphere for D.II' (top) and MAM (bottom)
38
z*20o(m)
JJA
c
ON
ON
180 E
z*2no(m)
SON
180 E
125
100
175
HHi
150
25
0
75
50
25
0
Figure 34: 200mb Departure of Geopotential Height from the Zonal Mean (mj
Southern Hemisphere for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
39
u-,01 (m/s)
1X1 1
'.
•.
-
_
;- ; s -
20E 180
Lon (des;)
20W 60W
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
u200(m/s)
MAM
N
30N-
t/j
•
|60
1 55
— 50
45
40
35
30
25
Lon (cleg)
Figure 35: 200 mb Zonal Wind (m/s) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
40
Uonn (m/s)
JJA
60N
30N
S3
-J
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
45
40
35
30
25
u2oo (m/s)
SON
Lon (deg)
Figure 36: 200 mb Zonal Wind (m/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
45
40
35
30
25
4!
v2oo(m/s)
DJF
-
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
7.5
5
2.5
0
v7nn(m/s)
MAM
zh
7.5
5
2.5
0
Lon (deg)
200 mb Meridional Wind I ni/s; ior DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
42
v?00(m/s)
JJA
-
-J
7.5
5
2.5
C
Lon (deg)
V2oo(m/s)
SON
20E 1!
Lon (deg)
60W
5
2.5
0
Figure 38: 200 mb Meridional Wind (m/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
43
_
l>
A\\\\\U
,\\\\\|nt
.\\\\\r
A\V|t
:\UT1 o
rr;°n r
trrfth,
rrhrkr
tttttKu
ifrwntti
ttrttttttn
, ttttjttrr
U \o t t T fo
.\\V\V
\\°\\
1 1 1
TTT
'\
NT
rrrfr
trci
CM
rfr
/ifftt TTit\l
tttttvi
rtrtttt
rtttur
ttttttt
ti'ttttt
ttjjt.t ft
t r r ?///
LO
/
t/T
tft
f f "TV/W^^o^
#i > A
ft
f 1
tf
tlt:f
111
TSf
/ i i \ \ \
/ I I \ \ \ *
f inivf.
^i an *^\
sjf/fW f tit
'shu hit
\4 lM l N
7/
\
/O. A V
t/t r
t T/T T
^iij
c
o
[In
1—1
Q
In
o
u
01)
a
<v
■ — i
-
cr
a
o
a
C
OJ
Ph
00
c
1
o
o
6s
■=>
Ph
O
I-
o
CO
o
IT)
O
rt-
o
CO CO CO
o o o
m to r^
44
<
1
c
l>
TOP
■ 1 t/f ?
tf
t
tt tot
r
tu
1
T
o a
CN /
*/
lA A A *p <A A
5Mt f T jit
f^tttt|^<>X*
fjt^ttitk-sWf t rjrt
foftf tffovl\\\ t tf //
f/t t K\ \7 <
\\\Mt
. CNI AAA*.
t ;t j
AAA.
\ \ \\vn r 1 1 1
^m^m T T V ■ ^ T ft T ^ ^
♦ m A T T» T ^ » V ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
AAA A A, to A A A A A ^ A
,rn
AAA A
/ J flt/f
1 1 U \ :\
Hi
life
fTf/
*r<-)A a
fit,,.
fttAi
t t'W
,fO.
ACN -
to
?MJ& t
rrrtitujxKw
tfttttVCwW
tit
nhtfK ^\nt
t ^UA^H
tt tt tt
\/j ttttttt
wL/tt ottt
f w^ tt\t
I V W /fit
TTTTfTT
f ttt|/t
A AAAAAA
t Mil. tit
Mtt4J)t
f 1 1 1 1 1 1
t/t 1 1 1 1 1
i I i j i j
T T tS ^^ T T T
(ttfllf
AAAAAA
rlt-Tt?
t-tfrft
tuff
tf tt t/t
tttttfT
T _Jr ' T T t T
aaaaIaO
ttttttl
tf
1
r
t/f
o
-J
V".
—
o
o
o
>
0/J
c
JO
—
n
o
* — i
o
u
13
53
"3
U
o
C
C
r |
d
-r
•—
-
(gap) ^q
45
<
>
wmut
'ttthrr .
ttwttm
tvulttttt
. t Htttrt
N\ tit t t T T
\\"2iHtt
V
t o tukv/^ ^ ift/tttu
t ttt
f Ttt
fltt-t
tttt Tt
tymtt
t n vt ft
f It t J 1 1 1
mt int tnv^ r/:fttu|tf:l Mi
twtittmwyjA tttn\\\\k\t
fJt fittttt\jjC Mnv^vt/uT
nw/tttfr ru*/t tvKw \
tit tit * ?s^"f?n\\\\
ttt r /^v///A\\ \
ttt r/^_^v^ ^\l\oititi
lr r r n/ *
rf.fr/
, tn°/
ttt tit i
ttttlrt
\ \i\ t r r
vonn
wtwtt r
tt
tt
ttt
T T T T \ l r
tttt
tttt
tttt
TTTT
TTTT
A .* A A CN
ff f f
tttt
i1 r i* if1 T T
I I* r /p ^ ^
T I* I l* I* I*
o
4 CN
f
r
r
r
/
/
/ °
o
CN
o
CO
U
c
O
.o
1/1
u
2
o
>
C
3
cr
D
c
O
■ — h
CJ
T3
C
r3
ex
c
1
O
O
r i
3
bfl
• ■— i
(/> CY)
o o
to r~-
(Sap) prj
46
z
o
C/3
1
c
c
l>
H.Ht T f f f
^ » ^ ^ ^ ' ^ *fr 4i
wttn
f / AMI
ffttjj T
^ t t u*ft T T T
tit ft tit
t 1 T T T T T
fir
,™
A\U
\\f!
wit
WW
iw
Mto
:\ \ n
x t ?/7
t th
1 1 rt t
rtitt
rttt
nit tt
rtt
ttt\\\
tttm\
tt.tfjj
Wtftttyti'
Sill
ItrMtfjh
Mt t t<$ t t +
mi vt ////,
t f ttt oTK\V\b
ft f tt/1£,W*
t
r
o
c
o
-J
y
o
on
■—
.o
—
0
—
o
o
3
c
O
o
r3
T3
1
c
n
cN
-r
-
CO CO CO
o o o
to ■*■ un
CO CO
o o
(Sap) nn
47
>
u
c
o
-J
I—)
Q
—
z
s.
o
*_>
o
o
>
bfl
c
u
c
_o
o
u
c
73
T3
O
a
on
"d
I
O
in
en
(gap) nn
48
CO
E
oo
l>
k*-
^^Atif
TT
^ ^ s // /f Vt/T 1 1 1 '
HJllU
if •* v/v
Uii K>'
"If? ft
\ \ if r
lk\ r-f/n
fit 1 1 1
nf 1 1 1
f
t f t ' ' m ^
lo
Mill
A
flttl
>f It Tl T T T
-J,
/Ttt
/ttt
A A A A
A A A A
ttt
ttt
tttt
tu
Af
>*
m
\\ \ M»n _
//?/yfi >
&
Ur/tf
t
^
Vs^J^i
I
)jff/M If
t
IK
< TIT
/ ft
l/f
IT)
,m<
/ /
k .
l^n.
iin
o
o
CO
O
to CO
o o
U
—
c
-J
CO CO
o o
id r--
■—
c
— '
•J
u
>
1
a
— I
—
G
g
o
—
T3
o
o
IT.
-r
u
(gap) jBi
49
<
l>
AVs\
.\vW
WW
\\\\
Law
\ \W
u {jt\r
K t pvJ7^
/ n t ?w
/Xft/s.
Ttt.T f /
un r /
bfl
c
o
1-1
o
i-
2
o
>
«— >
bO
G
JH
cr
C
o
o
1-c
T3
C
-3
-a
f
O
in
oo
in
-1-
bfl
O
r
O
to
o
o
o
O
r J
o
UJ
in in in in
o o o o
t- csj ro •**-
o
m
to (/)
o o
50
c
c
l>
TIT
Sfttkttftoy
t
f ft
;.f
pl^\tt ft;
i^vi tit t
i^Ejtit t
ii^V/f ttt
:i y^fjw///KA t r
r /////
f ; f f /7t
T T/T T
t int' t m
t'tt
(it Hi
r/ f Y t t t t
fit t H
^/v\T 1 1 1 1
t\
tt
ittfl
A1
/ft
/ft
f ft
h
o
o
CO
ttl t
ft ft
f f '
ft'
til^fr^Nj^
tttt/r >^*V
ttfr
f\\^1\tt-ff .
o
O
co
CZ3
•—
s
•—
O
>
—
5:
bJO
o
a
rsi
<u
13
—
o
C
2
o
bfl
—
u
o
^3
Q
CO
e
c
-o
s.
|
T3
O
<u
a
on
UJ
—
o
a
CN
5
i
m
a
-r
LlJ
=
o
bO
CD
1
Tt
(gap) nn
5:
lm (lxl06m2/s)
D.IF
:
"J
—
-
-
10
8
6
4
2
I20E 180
Lon (de^
"...
jC850(lxl06m2/s)
MAM
Lon (den)
12
10
8
6
4
2
850 inb Velocity Potential i ! x 10 ' m2/s) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
52
XR,a (lxl06m2/s)
JJA
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
;20E 11
Lon (deg)
90N
Xsso(lxl06m2/s)
SON
60E 120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
10
8
6
4
2
Figure 48: 850 mb Velocity Potential (1x10 rrr/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
53
?,H (1x10° nr/s
^
DJF
20E 180 120W
Lon (dec)
-6
-9
-12
-15
-18
5C90n (lxl06m2/s)
MAM
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
-6
-9
Figure 49:
200 mb Velocitv Potent i;ii . i x !(/" nr/si for I J.I I- (top) and MAM (bottom)
54
%200 (lxl06m2/s)
JJA
-
-J
6
-9
-12
-15
-18
-21
-24
-27
Lon (des)
%9nn (lxl06m2/s)
SON
120E II
Lon (des)
-6
-9
-12
-15
Figure 50: 200 mb Velocity Potential ( lx 10 nr/s) for JJA I topi and SON (bottom)
55
*p850 (lxl06m2/s)
DJF
N
N
zi.
i : 5
U-"IU=
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
t}?850 (lxl06m2/s)
MAM
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
6 7,
850 mb Stream Function f i x I 0 ' nr/s) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
56
>6_2
Tj78,0 (1x10° mz/s) JJA
60N -(
30M
bJQ
-J
30S-.
60S —
120E 1
Lon (deg)
6_2,
^0(lxlO°mz/s)
SON
60E
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
Figure 52: 850 mb Stream Function( lxlO6 m2/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
57
tp:oo (lxl06m2/s)
DJF
D
_
N
■
:c
: : 5 -
60S-
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
6_2,
^on(10Dnr7s)
MAM
-/,
60N-
'.
.
60S
60E 120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
F-igure 53:
200 nib Stream Function ( 1x10 m2/sj lor DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
58
6_2,
W)
-
-J
tp,m (1x10° nV7s)
JJA
60E
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
60W
6_2,
T]79nn (1x10° nr7s)
SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (de^)
Figure 54: 200 mb Stream Function ( IxlO6 m2/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
59
qSs0lg/kg)
DJF
: .
—
-
_
30SH
60S
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
I
12
1 1
10
9
8
7
6
q850 (g/kg)
MAM
_
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60 W
12
111
10
9
8
7
6
850 mb Specific Humidity (g/kg; for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
icld was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
60
q85o(g/kg)
JJA
60K
30N
bij
0)
T3
r3
30S-
50S
Lon (deg)
qsso (g/kg)
SON
1
12
1 1
10
9
8
7
6
Lon (deg)
Figure 56: 850 mb Specific Humidity (g/kg) ior JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
61
co500(mb/day)
DJF
60 N
:
-
30S
60S-
0
25
-50
1-75
100
125
Lon (deg)
60N-
30N-
tru (nib/day)
MAM
&/j
30S-
r/r
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
0
-25
-50
.-75
-100
I
125
500 nib Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
r!n- fieid was smoothed using a9poini iiltcr 'see data analysis section).
62
G5,00 (mb/day)
JJA
CD
•a
-J
60S - 1
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
0
-25
-50
-75
-100
-125
CD,00 (mb/day)
SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
S
■
I
0
-25
-50
-75
-100
-125
Figure 58' 500 mb Vertical Velocity (mb/day) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
63
:
CLD, (%)
[>ll;
60E 120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
190
■ 75
60
45
30
CLDlow (%)
MAM
"...
■
180 120W
Lon (deg)
90
75
1 ^^
45
30
. :-
■.
:
Low level Composite (sigma levels 0.997, 0.979, 0.935)
Clouds [%) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
:ld was smoothed using a 9 poinl filter (see data analysis section).
64
CLDlow{%)
JJA
—
-
-
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
90
30
CLDlow (%)
SON
90N
Lon (dee)
Figure 60: Low level Composite (sigma levels 0.997, 0.979, 0.935 )
Clouds (%) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section;
90
75
60
45
30
65
CLDmid{%)
n.n
.
-- .
Lon (deg)
CLDmid (%)
MAM
Lon (deg)
Figure 61 : Mid level Composite (sigma levels 0.568, 0.46)
Clouds ('/< ) lor [III (top) and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point Idler (see data analysis section).
45
■ 37.5
30
22.5
15
4 b
M37.5
: 30
22.5
15
66
CLDnnd{%)
JJA
5/j
—
-
_
90N
60N-
30N
90S
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
45
37.5
30
22.5
15
CLDmid (%)
SON
Lon (deg)
Figure 62: Mid level Composite (sigma levels 0.568. 0.46)
Clouds (%) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
67
CLDhi.h(%)
n.ii-
—
-
_
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
I 60
| 50
I 40
^30
20
s/j
90N
CLDW^ (%)
MAM
•
Lon (deg)
Figure 63: High level Composite (sigma levels 0.353, 0.257)
Clouds (%) for DJF Mopi and MAM (bottom)
:ld was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section
60
68
CLDhlKh{%)
JJA
73
-
-J
Lon (des)
90S^
Lon (deg)
Figure 64: High level Composite (sigma levels 0.355, 0.257)
Clouds (%) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
60
B50
J 40
"30
20
60
50
40
30
20
69
\Qneldo (°C day)
DJF
60N -
Z:.
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
4.5
3.75
3
2.25
1.5
0.75
0
\Qneldo CC/day)
MAM
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
4.5
3.75
3
2.25
1.5
0.75
0
figure 65: Mass Weighted Vertical Integral of
)iabatic Heating (°C / 'day) for DJF 'top; and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
70
JS„,ao rC/clay)
JJA
60N
30 N
00
30S-
60S-
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
4.5
3.75
3
2.25
1.5
0.75
0
$Qnetdc> CC/day) SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
0.75
0
Figure 66: Mass Weighted Vertical Integral of
Net Diabatic Heating (°C/day) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
71
6. Seasonal Mean Surface Plots
Free (mm/day) DJF
'.
30N
_
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
Prec (mm/day)
MAM
60N
30N
W)
30S-
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
16
14
1 12
I 1 0
8
6
4
Figure 67- Precipitation (mm/day) lor DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
72
60N
30N-
30S
60S
Prec (mm/day)
60E
JJA
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
I
16
I 12
I 10
|g
6
4
Prec (mm/day)
SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
Figure 68: Precipitation ( mm/day j for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
73
P., (mb)
DJF
'.
—
-
_
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
1008
1004
l1000
5 996
992
988
984
Ps,(mb)
MAM
S/J
120E 180
Lon (dcg)
1008
1004
1000
996
992
988
1
1984
l
69 Mean Sea Level Pressure (mb.i for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom )
74
Ps, (mb)
JJA
H-l
60E
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
1008
1004
1000
996
992
988
984
i
Ps, (mb)
SON
60N-
30N
T3
-J
30S-
60S
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
1008
1004
1000
996
992
988
1 984
1
Figure 70: Mean Sea Level Pressure (mb) for JJA (topj and SON (bottom)
75
Vsfc (m/s)
DJF
-
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
12
l 10
I 8
6
90N
60N
Vsfc (m/s)
MAM
Zij
—
-;;■
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
12
10
*8
I 6
i4
f'igure 71 Surface Wind Speed ;m/s; and Direction (equal length vectors)
for DJF (top; and MAM (bottom)
76
W)
-J
90N
60N-
30N-
Vsfc (m/s)
JJA
30S
60S-1
90S
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
12
I 10
8
6
4
90N
Vsfc (m/s)
SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
6
4
Figure 72: Surface Wind Speed im/s> ana Direction (equal length vectors;
for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
77
K3
-J
90N
60N-
T (N/m2)
DJF
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
1|
0.35
10.3
So. 25
(0.2
0.15
90N
t (N/m2)
MAM
90S
60E 120E 180 120W 60W 0
Lon (deg)
0.35
0.3
I 0.25
0.2
0.15
Figure 73:
Surface Wind Stress (N/m2) and Direction (equal length vectors)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
78
C3
90N
T (N/m2)
JJA
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
■ 0.4
J 0.35
Jo. 3
^0.25
I 0.2
0.15
90N
T (N/m2)
SON
60E
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
I
III0-4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
Figure 74: Surface Wind Stress (N/m2) and Direction (equal length vectors)
for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
79
Qsh(W/m2)
DJF
60N-*
~3
_
120E 180
Lon (deg)
20
105
90
75
60
45
30
Qsh (W/m2)
MAM
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
Figure 75: Sensible Heat Flux (W/m2) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
80
Qsh (W/m2)
JJA
60N
30N
X3
73
-
EQ-
30S
60S
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (dee)
90
75
„ 60
^45
30
Qsh (W/m2)
SON
20E 180 120W 60W 0
Lon (deg)
90
75
60
45
30
Figure 76: Sensible Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
81
Q,h (W/m2)
DJF
60N
30NH
30S-
60S-
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
200
175
150
11 125
100
Qih (W/m2)
MAM
60E
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
200
175
1 1 50
125
100
Figure 77: Latent Heat Flux (W/m2) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
82
Q,h (W/m2)
JJA
60N
30NH
-J
30S
60S
20E 180 120W
Lon (des)
200
175
150
\
1 25
100
Qih (W/m2)
SON
60N-
30N
73
-J
30S
60S-
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
200
175
1 150
1 25
100
Figure 78: Latent Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
83
Qsw (W/m2)
DJF
300
275
250
I 225
200
Lon (des)
Qsw (W/m2)
MAM
60N--
30N-
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
300
275
1250
l225
200
Figure 79: Short Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy gain to the ocean.
I his field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
X4
Qsw (W/m2)
JJA
60N-
30N
Si)
0)
3
30S
60S
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
Qsw (W/m2)
SON
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
?3
300
275
250
225
200
Figure 80: Short Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy gain to the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
85
Qi* (W/m2)
DJF
.
;-:\
1)
_
; : 5
• ; s ■-
20E 180 120W 60W
Lon (des)
100
90
80
70
60
Q,w (W/m-)
MAM
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
100
90
80
70
60
Long Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for DJF Hop) and MAM (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean.
field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
86
Qlw (W/m2) JJA
60N
-J
20E 180
Lon (deg)
I
100
■
■H Q Q
' 80
I
I 70
*60
Qiw (W/m2)
SON
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
I
100
lli90
■ 80
60
Figure 82: Long Wave Radiative Flux (W/m2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy loss from the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
87
Qo C*/m:)
DJF
'■
30N
•: ; 5
120E 180
Lon (deg)
160
120
80
40
0
Qo (W/m2)
MAM
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
160
120
80
40
0
Net Surface Heal Mux (W/m2) lor DJF (lop) and MAM (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy gain to the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a () point filter (see data analysis section).
:■::-;
Qo (W/m2)
JJA
60N
30N-
-
30S
60S-
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
160
120
80
40
■ 0
Qo (W/m2)
SON
60N-
30N
bJO
T3
-
30S- •
60S
20E 180
Lon (des;)
160
■ 120
|80
m 40
0
Figure 84: Net Surface Heat Flux (W/m2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
A positive flux indicates an energy gain to the ocean.
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
89
v.
<
id
B
O
*
4-J
o
1)
o
m
■—
>
<
3
B
B
the ocean,
ta analysis se
5=
o
CM I
|o
<
•—
3.
n
y gain to
er (see da
|(0
_
S
W)Ei
U :-H
0/J
E *-<
T3
X
0> E
3
E O
o 1
lo
B
U.
c3 &,
<o H
!■«*■
O
3 «*
1
%
J
r3
5
(U
rt
o bo
•-5.5
o
o
E 52
CM
—
■—
3
CO
e flux i
othed l
Ul
o
CM
Ul
O
O
z
in
CC
—
3
00
LE
A positiv
This field was smo
(§9p) j^q
90
7. Interannual Variability:
Interannual Standard Deviations and EOF's
d(Zsnn) (m)
DJF
60N
30N-
r3
30S
60S
60E 120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
70
60
50
30
20
a(zj (m)
•500
MAM
60E
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
70
60
|50
!40
30
20
Figure 86: Interannual Standard Deviation of 500 mb Geopotential Height (m)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
91
o(:,()())(m)
DJF
-3
7l
20E 180
Lon (dee)
70
60
50
40
30
20
aUsm) (m)
MAM
20E 180
Lon (deg)
70
60
50
40
30
20
Figure 86:
Interannual Standard Deviation of 500 mb Geopotential Height (m)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
91
o(zsnn)(m)
JJA
?;\ -
30N-
—
1
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
a(z.m) (m)
J500
SON
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
50
"40
30
20
Figure 87: Interannuai Standard Deviation of 500 mb Geopotential Height (m)
for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
92
a(w9nn) (m/s)
DJF
T3
S3
-J
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
8
7
6
5
4
3
a(w9nn) (m/s)
MAM
120E 180
Lon (deg)
20W 60W
8
7
6
5
4
3
Figure 88: Interannual Standard Deviation of 200 mb Zonal Wind (m/s)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
93
G(//,m) (m/s)
JJA
60N-
30N-
_
30S
60S
Lon (deg)
a(w9m) (m/s)
SON
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
4
Mgure 89: Interannual Standard Deviation of 200 mb Zonal Wind (m/s)
for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
04
c(P .) (mb)
DJF
60N
30N
T3
-J
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
6
5.5
5
r4.5
A
1 3.5
3
2.5
2
a OP.,) (mb)
MAM
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
60W
::■. : ■
Figure 90: Interannual Standard Deviation of Sea Level Pressure (mb)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
95
a(Psl) (mb)
JJA
60 N
30N
3
30S-.
60S
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
5
4.5
4
3.5
■ 3
2.5
2
a(P5/) (mb)
SON
60E
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
Figure 9 1 : Interannual Standard Deviation of Sea Level Pressure ( mb I
for JJA (top; and SON (bottom)
96
zsnn EOF 1 (37.4%) DJF
•500
o
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
o
■500
180 E
EOF 2 (21.1%) DJF
180 E
Figure 92: 500mb Height Empirical Orthogonal Functions
(using covariances) for EOF 1 (top) and EOF 2 (bottom)
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.01
0
97
z500 EOF 1 (45.8%) MAM
'j-
0.05
0.04
I 0.03
0.02
0.01
0
'J2
O
80 E
z500 EOF 2 (12.9%) MAM
:0-0-0.0T^<-0.03v
180E
Figure 93: 500mb Height Empirical Orthogonal Functions
(using covariances) for EOF 1 (top) and EOF 2 (bottom)
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
98
■500
EOF 1 (22.1%) JJA
©
0.05
0.04
p0.03
i: :V :. ;';■<
0.01
0
©
180 E
z500 EOF 2 (14.7%) JJA
180 E
Figure 94: 500mb Height Empirical Orthogonal Functions
(using covariances) for EOF 1 (top) and EOF 2 (bottom)
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
99
•500
, EOF 1 (35.3%) SON
o
0.05
0.04
0.03
a0.02
0.01
1 o
c
c500
180 E
EOF 2 (14.6%) SON
180 E
Figure 95: 500mb Height Empirical Orthogonal Functions
for EOF 1 (top j and EOF 2 (bottom)
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
1 00
8. Middle Latitude Processes
60N
30N
-J
Vr^h-|()(OC-'"AY)
DJF
30S
60S-=^^
5
4
Lon (deg)
MAM
60S
8
7
6
5
4
Lon (deg)
Figure 96: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Heat
Flux [°C ■ m/s) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
101
v'r 850 3-10 (°C-m/s)
JJA
60N
30N
—
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
8
7
■6
5
4
Lon (deg)
Figure 97: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Heat
Flux (°C • m/s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
I
8
7
■ 6
5
4
!02
I'V^oK-m (S-m/kg-s
60N
30N
7d
r3
60E
1 20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
5
r 4
1§3
2
V4 850 3-10 (g-™/kg-s)
MAM
Lon (deg)
Figure 98: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Moisture
Flux (g ■ m/kg ■ s) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
5
4
3
2
103
60 N
30N
-3
30S
60S
v q 85o 3-10 (8-m/kg-s)
JJA
60E 120E 180
Lon (deg)
20W
60W
3
2
v 4 850 3-10 (g-m/kg-s)
SON
Lon (deg)
Figure 99: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 850mb Transient Meridional Moisture
Flux (# • m/kg ■ s) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
3
2
104
irv'nnh-u) (m2/s2)
60N
30N
<D
73
C3
30S-^V
6OS1
20E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
25
20
15
10
MAM
25
20
, 15
1 10
5
Lon (deg)
Figure 100: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 200mb Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal
Momentum (m2/s2) for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
105
"'v-;ooh-io (m2/s2)
JJA
\
30N
DO
—
-
_
30S-L=H
60S
20E 180 120W
Lon (dee)
25
20
15
10
5
Lon (deg)
Figure 101: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 200mb Transient Meridional Flux of Zonal
Momentum (m2/s2) for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
This field was smoothed using a 9 point filter (see data analysis section).
106
- u 3-10 + v' 3-10 ) (m2/s2)
DJF
60N
30N-
30S
60S
120E 180 120W
Lon (deg)
90
80
70
50
40
60N
30N
-I u 3-10 + v' 3-10 J (m^s2.
MAM
30S
60S
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
Figure 102: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 200mb Kinetic Energy (m2/s2)
for DJF (top) and MAM (bottom)
107
-I u' 3-10 + v' 3-10 J (m2/s2)
JJA
60 N
30NH
EQ-
30S
60S-:
120E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
90
80
1 70
60
50
40
60N
30N
1 -7T
-[ u' 3-10 + v' 3-10 J (m2/s2)
SON
EQ^
30S
60S
20E 180 120W 60W
Lon (deg)
U70
I 60
50
40
Figure 103: Mean 3-10 Day Filtered 200mb Kinetic Energy (m2/s2)
for JJA (top) and SON (bottom)
108
<
o
\
U
IlO
o
1 '
X
s= 1
o If
— 1
g
CM ft.
U-
0
ItO
TZ
Ji
1)
u
JrO
E
-C
~
s
c
<
l0^
o
o 1
00 i
S
cd
,— 1
<_i
C-
c
0
|LO
<u
Pq
•y.
C
u.
— ,
: '
u
n
H
•—
Tl
c
O
•—
•_
LU
|C7)
<D
O
CM
LJ_
in
i
Q
IT)
CO
LO
c
TJ
PH
(1 )
h»
1
bf)
cn
K)
C
(1)
r3
>
O
2
LU
en
O
CD
C
o
l-H
o
o
o
o
CM
o o o o o ooo
o o o ooooo
o
o
o
O
o
O OOOO
o
o
o
O
o
O OOOO
—
CM
ro
■3"
LT)
to r^oocro
(qui) ssajj
(qui) sssjj
109
O
t>5
\
U
r-
.2
in
IT)
^^
m
c
(1)
r^
m
—
1>
>
s
UJ
CX)
CD
CO
in
u
—
W3
o
o
o
o
o o o ooooo
o o o oooco
o
o
O
O
o
o oooo
O
o
C 3
t j
C 3
o oooo
«—
CM
to
^T
in
(£> r--COCTO
(qui) ssajj
(qui) SS3JJ
110
f o
to
ho
to
O
CD
Q
OC
o
ID
O
<
o
00
CD
r^
;:■,;■■;:■■
n
y.
C 1
x^::'x
g
£&M
o
<X>
-I
o
•
lO
s
E
CNJ
o
CD
O
00
a
_! o
C O
O -O
Si
U-, -a
o o o o o o
o o o o o o
*- CM ro ■<*■ iD CD
o o o o
o o o o
r~- oo en o
oooooooooo
oooooooooo
■— CNrO^LDtOr^OOCDO
(qiU) SS3JJ
(qui) ssajj
11!
z
C
en
n
r.
i
o
_;
to
a
c
6
* K
o •
CM |i
1 °
s?
Zonal
(botto
|o
^Z
| CI j
Flux (
ndSO
o 1
15 «
oo |f
' >
O Oh
o
CD
O
o
<u <C
-t— I
•—
c
n
OJ
VM
s.
c
z
r3
1/1
h-
in
i
—j
z
O
1/,
•—.
m
u
~* '
13
1)
Uh
M
^,
c3
•—
r3
u
Q
>
o
— i
CO
r-'
O
— i
o
•—
3
t/j
u-
o o o o o o
o o o o o o
^ <n n ^- in id
o o o o
o o o o
r-^ oo CD o
oooooooooo
oooooooooo
^CNr-OTj-LncDr^oOCDO
r
qUl) SS3J<J
(qui) ssajj
112
<
u
OJ
-i 1 1 1 1 i 1 r
ooooooooo
-i r
«- cNm^Lncor-oocn*—
ooooooooo
o
S-
<
—
O
U-
3
•—
,c
>n
in
i
in
m
x)
o
CO
—
>
c
u
S-
2
C
-
PA3^ BUI3IJS
pA9q uuiSts
113
<
0
^J
z
o
C/5
u
o
Oi
-i 1 1 1 r
*— CNiro-^-Lncor^oocn^
ooooooooo
-i 1 1 1 1 r-
i— CNiro^t-LncDr-coai'—
ooooooooo
o
o
3
Oh
c
<
in
in
i
in
m
<U
bO
r3
•—
U
>
r3
^3
X
bfl
c
S3
73
cd
u
O
u
•—
bO
|9A9q ^UJ§|S
|3A3q BUlSlS
14
{a(Z25()Vl()} (m)
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
%l 1
60 70 80
Lon (deg)
{U250} (m/s)
30 35 40
Lon (des)
Figure 1 10: 3-10 Day Filtered Standard Deviation of 250mb Geopotential
Heignt (m) (top) and Monthly Mean 250mb Zonal
Wind (m/s)(bottom), averaged 30N-50N.
115
9. Tropical Processes
U
N
'C ''SI*
ooooooooo
o
<
.2
— >
u
s—
u
c
0
N
0)
O-— CNi-O-^-LncDr^-oocn'—
ooooooooo
c
xa
• — ■
2
r> J
xi
m 2
c
~o
£
c
,
rt
n
- — s
g
Cl,
o
0
s.
I -
CJ
U-
j=.
' — )
Q
o
•__
03
c
— 1
'-i-i
z;
y.
*— '
—
C
o
71
13
>
E
~
03
C
„r.
rt
rt
•—
s.
rr|
Fl
E
03
—
o
u
■—
c
v.
03
„
£
Y<
0
c
n
o
00
C
Q
C
r i
ri
o/j -a
g3
u
■—
a)
S3
>
U
-
C/3
„
v.
c
K!
c
£
rt
>,
——
.
—>
■ i
Z
u
03
>
—
a3
-:
C
'>
c
N
03
c
>
03
H
03
S-H
[3A3"] £UJ§[S
|9A9q eui§is
<
O
U
~
c
N
<=.
-i 1 r ' i i i — i—
ooooooooo
4-o
o
in
c
as
U
■—
u
C
N
-*- — < < <-
1 4
5
0
— i
— '
0
-C
s— -'
/-.
n
C
—
m
C/3
c
T3
G
£
S3
r^
■ '
ri
Ui
n
c
s
<
r
o
•—
T3
/
3
■~
^
o
ri
' 1
M
(1)
s3
>
h'
T3
a)
: ■
Kl
j-
■n
./".
—
1)
S3
c
a
1
E
o
n
o
■
•—
■*— ►
.
/
1)
X.
X3
3
IN
2
■
_-
y:
c
C
3
ri
r j
—
>.
(U
£3
—
•_
QJ
•-
S3
y.
S3
S3
>.
:j
O
—
0
u
<L>
>
r3
C
S3
r;
U
X
i->
r
<u
S3
>
r i
<u
-
—
—
3
M
-
pA9q ^iuSts
|3A3q BUI51S
117
2
u
^J
<
>.
a
U
O^
1
ro
T
lO
tc
r-^
00
CT: *
O
O
O
o
O
o
o
a
O
-I — ' I ~~1 1 — -I —
ooooooooo
c
<
-a
c
D-
O
U-
03
C
I
Z
o
X3
<D
C/J
S3
Wh
U
>
"S3
\
(30
c
U
5
bfl
[3a3^ eiu^is
[9A9"] BUlSlJS
18
T°
<
>.
OJ
z
o
u
o
OJ
£
o
— i
o
O
c
-1,
c
o
CO
c
T3
O
bfl
—
>
7!
-z
"a
\
M
C
X
y.
<0
■—
oooodoooo
J3A3"| EUlBl$
|3A3q eui§is
119
{)U_ inn) ( lxl° m2/s) Model Year 4
Lon (deg)
Figure 115: 250mb Velocity Potential ( 1x10 m2/s) filtered to retain periodicities of
20-100 days, averaged ION- 1 OS, for model year 4
120
{%20_100} (lxl(f m2/s) Model Year 7
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
Lon (deg)
Figure 1 16: 250mb Velocity Potential (1x10 m2/s) filtered to retain periodicities of
20-100 days, averaged 10N-10S. for model year 7
121
<: U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1996—774-842
ADDDDEM7Et171D
ADDDDEM7ET71D